Question frame
Define the claim, constraints, success criteria and decision the work must support.
Tuciva runs bounded technical feasibility programmes. We define the claim, isolate the decisive unknowns and build the shortest credible route to evidence. The result is a reasoned decision to advance, revise or stop.
Programme structureThe decision
A feasibility study should change what happens next.
The useful question is rarely whether an idea sounds plausible. It is which technical uncertainty governs the decision, and what evidence would resolve it.
Tuciva concentrates effort there: enough analysis, experimentation and prototype work to make the next commitment rational without allowing the investigation to become open-ended development.
Programme elements
Each programme is shaped around the claim being tested and the consequence of getting the answer wrong.
Define the claim, constraints, success criteria and decision the work must support.
Select models, experiments and measurements proportionate to the technical risk.
Build only the rigs or prototypes needed to test the governing assumptions.
Interpret the results, limitations and remaining risk without overstating the evidence.
Working sequence
Agree the technical claim, governing constraints and decision threshold.
Choose the shortest credible sequence of models, tests and measurements.
Run the investigation with traceable methods and explicit limitations.
Set out what is established, what remains uncertain and what should happen next.
Programme outputs
The precise set depends on the question. A bounded programme may leave behind:
Bounded scope
Clear limits make useful work.
Feasibility work is a bounded technical investigation, not open-ended development or a substitute for statutory testing or certification.
Scope, evidence threshold, confidentiality and the decision point are agreed before work begins.
Confidential enquiries
Tell us what must be established, what is already known and which decision depends on the answer.
Discuss technical feasibility